Hoax: Scientists worldwide admit global warming is a hoax
I have to admit that I almost fell for this, and I was about to post this article about scientists admitting that global warming was a fraud over at Current.com, Al Gore’s website, until I noticed that it was still April Fools day.
The Christian Science Monitor reported that a press release from the committee from Rajendra Pachauri, the UN climate panel’s chair, stated that he was the victim of a “cunning deception spanning decades”. When you click on the source you then realized that you’ve just been “rickrolled” (ha ha very funny) and the joke’s on you. Or is it?
I am not a scientist, and I admit that for a while that had fallen hook line and sinker for the propaganda that humans cause global warming until I took a look at both sides of the argument. And since I cannot prove conclusively that man has causes so called global warming (and neither can the scientists), I leave it up to people who can back up their claims with relevant evidence. I got the information below from a plusaf, a member from Current.com. Again, I do not claim that this information is 100% accurate, but it has not yet been debunked on Current and debunkers are welcomed to post their rebuttals here.
The IPCC’s failure of predicting the temperature change during the first decade…
“The chart … shows the general trend since the end of the little ice age, with the normal “multi-decadal” oscillation superimposed. The green arrow shows where we are now.
The multi-decadal oscillation is caused by a combination of factors related to the Sun. Most important driver is the Sunspot cycle. Orbital dynamics is also a factor.”
You see, yes, there is an uptrend, but no, it’s not a straight line, because there are multiple driving factors.
Look again for the green arrow and the red dot: “YOU ARE HERE.”
And yes, there’s been global warming in the past, but that’s the danger in extrapolating into the future from the “average slope” of the history….
From this graph, it’s darned easy to show that we’re on the downslope [ie, cooling trend slope] of an overall uptrend.
Even the overall trend is only a half degree 90 years from now, and cycles are expected to continue, but the deviations from the slope appear cyclical, and to deny that is to …. well, in the end, make yourself look kinda silly.
Ok, denier-deniers and gore-apologists, start your attacks… feel free.
The chart above shows the recent (200 year) history of CO2 measures. The ones circled are the ones used in the UN IPCC report. When they cherry picked the data and then applied exponential weighting, it produced the hockey stick graph that Al Gore used in the movie. Exponential weighting will produce a hockey stick graph from random data. Actual trend is slightly down. “Early CO2 data ‘cherry-picked’ to prove humanity was causing a massive increase. (Tim Ball, Univ of Winnipeg climate scientist)”
And on the subject of Obama’s ludicrous notion that global warming is a threat to national security:
Few challenges facing America and the world are less urgent than combating the non-problem of “global warming”.
On all measures, there has been no increase in global mean surface temperatures since 1995; and, according to the University of Alabama at Huntsville, near-surface temperatures in 2008 will be lower than in 1980, 28 years ago, the first complete year of satellite observations. On all measures, global temperatures have been falling for seven full years since late 2001. The January-to-January fall in temperatures between 2007 and 2008 was the greatest since global temperature records were first compiled in 1880, 128 years ago. The rate of new Arctic sea-ice formation in mid-October 2008 was among the fastest since satellite records began almost 30 years ago. There has been no decline whatsoever in the total global extent of sea ice since satellite records began. New records for the extent of northern-hemisphere snow cover were observed by the satellites in the winter of 2001 and again in 2007. This year, many ski resorts are opening early as Arctic weather strikes. Many temperature stations in the northern hemisphere recorded record low temperatures in October/November 2008.
“Global warming” does not, cannot, and will not represent the slightest threat to the national security of the United States. On this too, Obama is not correct. Not only has the planet not warmed for 13 years (or perhaps even for 28 years): even if it were to warm as much as the UN imagines, the consequences would not be as severe as Obama and others have suggested. For instance, the UN projects that global temperatures will rise by 3.3 Celsius at doubling of CO2 concentration: however, much of that increase in concentration and in temperatures has already occurred over the past century, and sea levels rose by just 8 inches. The UN expects sea level in the 21st century to rise by just 1ft 5in. It is also generally accepted that even a global temperature increase of 2 Celsius would not harm agriculture: indeed, it would be likely to increase agricultural and forestry yields. A temperature increase of more than 2 Celsius as a result of increasing CO2 concentration is highly unlikely, and is founded upon mere speculation by the UN’s climate panel. Even if such a temperature increase were to occur, it would be largely harmless and beneficial.
Global warming skeptics linked with Holocaust denial
Climate ‘denial’ is know a mental disorder
Carbon the currency of a new world order
UK evironmental minister plans carbon trading ‘credit cards’ for everyone
Obama’s Nightmare “Green Agenda” Officially Unveiled
Obama’s New World Order Part 3: The War On Global Warming
‘Greens’ movement may have darker agenda