White House Issues Press Release And Statements From President Obama For Michael Brown, But Not For Samantha Ramsey
Under The Radar Media
Aside from the obvious problem of having a enemy-occupied media, there is also the problem of the controlled media’s willingness to collude with its controlled assets within the enemy-occupied government, when convenient.
While it is not certain if the plan to “eventize” the shooting incident of Michael Brown (while downplaying similar events) came from the Obama Administration, or the Democratic National Committee(DNC), or some American intelligence agency, or from the smokey backroom of some major advertising agency, or some combination thereof, it is certain that the incident was intentionally manufactured to promote the idea of a nation-wide crisis.
This theory can be easily verified by examining the cases of the police shooting of Samantha Ramsey and the police shooting of Michael Brown. These were two similar incidents that happened just months apart from each other. The only two differences were that one of the victims was African-American and the other was Caucasian, and one incident was completely blown out of proportion and the other was mostly ignored. Interestingly enough, the Huffington Post let their readers know that the incident involving Samantha Ramsey was a “crime,” while the Michael Brown incident is “political” (see screenshot above).
On August 18, 2014 President Obama issued a statement on the shooting of Michael Brown and Ferguson, MO; announcing that his Justice Department was going to involved in the promotion of this event. Then on November 24, 2014, the president issued yet another statement on the Ferguson incident.
“As you know, a few moments ago, the grand jury deliberating the death of Samantha Ramsey issued its decision. It’s an outcome that, either way, was going to be subject of intense disagreement not only in Boone County, but across America. So I want to just say a few words suggesting how we might move forward.
First and foremost, we are a nation built on the rule of law. And so we need to accept that this decision was the grand jury’s to make. There are Americans who agree with it, and there are Americans who are deeply disappointed, even angry. It’s an understandable reaction. But I join Samantha’s parents in asking anyone who protests this decision to do so peacefully. Let me repeat Samantha’s father’s words: “Hurting others or destroying property is not the answer. No matter what the grand jury decides, I do not want my daughter’s death to be in vain. I want it to lead to incredible change, positive change, change that makes the Boone County region better for everyone.” Samantha Ramsey’s parents have lost more than anyone. We should be honoring their wishes.
I also appeal to the law enforcement officials in Boone County and the region to show care and restraint in managing peaceful protests that may occur. Understand, our police officers put their lives on the line for us every single day. They’ve got a tough job to do to maintain public safety and hold accountable those who break the law. As they do their jobs in the coming days, they need to work with the community, not against the community, to distinguish the handful of people who may use the grand jury’s decision as an excuse for violence — distinguish them from the vast majority who just want their voices heard around legitimate issues in terms of how communities and law enforcement interact.
Video: Watch Hollywood Hypocrites Demand Gun Control For Citizens As Their Movies Promote Gun Violence
President Obama and his hypocritical Hollywood anti-gun coalition are attacking the rights of law abiding citizens to protect themselves. Watch the video below exposing these clowns acting out an endless stream of horrific gun violence in their movies and teevee shows as they call for regular citizen’s rights to be curtailed. Aside the fact that these “stars” are probably all gun owners themselves, I believe that the armed body guards and the private security services that they employ will likely be exempt from all of the new regulations that they are calling for.
All it takes is just two minutes of basic research to figure out that the tiny elite that run Hollywood are part of the same tiny elite that are behind all of the major gun control legislation since 1968.
I recommend boycotting Hollywood altogether, but if you feel the need to contribute to an industry dedicated to the degeneration of society, then at the very least consider boycotting the works of the following Hollywood Gun-Grabbers For Zion:
Jamie Foxx, Jason Bateman, Paul Rudd, Beyonce Knowles, Amy Poehler, Jeremy Renner, Amanda Pete, Jon Hamm, Carla Gugino, Jessica Alba, Reese Witherspoon, Rashida Jones, Will Ferrell, Sarah Silverman, Aziz Ansari, John Legend, Olivia Munn, Kathryn Hahn, Julianne Moore, Busy Phillips, Jennifer Garner, John Slattery, Nick Offermann, Chris Rock, Cameron Diaz, Courtney Cox, Christina Applegate, Zooey Deschanel, Steve Carrell, Adam Scott, Ellen Degeneres, Mark Ruffalo, Kate Hudson, Peter Dinklage, Jennifer Aniston, Elizabeth Banks, Max Greenfeld,Gwyneth Paltrow, Conan Obrien, Aubrey Plaza, Debra Messing, Megan Mullaly, Jennifer Westfeldt, Selena Gomez, Michelle Williams, Chris Paul, Victor Cruz
Burn Hollywood burn!
This audio file, documenting the mainstream media news coverage from Election Night 2008, is crucial listening. Consider this information as you sit glued to your TeeVee set Tuesday waiting for the results from Election Night 2012.
Under The Radar Media
We are but days away from Election Day 2012. Now that all of the ridiculous election pageantry is over, Americans will finally get to choose whether to re-elect President Barack Obama, or vote him out and choose to elect Mitt Romney as President of the United States of America.
Tensions are running high among the populace. There seems to a growing unease as politics seems to be on the lips of eveyone, and people who are normally better versed in NFL and Dancing With The Stars are suddenly armchair political experts.
A growing number of Americans are aware that there are very serious problems with the American political establishment but are either unable, or unwilling to accept even the most basic, fundamental problem of the system. The interesting thing is that the problem is a very simple, easily identifiable one, however the solution has proven to be an extremely elusive one.
Speaking on internet radio back in September of 2010, independent Argentinian researcher, essayist and lecturer, Adrian Salbuchi made a short but poignant analysis on the fundamental problem of the American political system.
I think that we are reaching the point where are a series of acid tests, and one of those acid tests is that you cannot be discreet, nice, lukewarm, ahh…diplomat, about…for example, certain key questions. One of which is the Jewish question.
I know it’s going to bring whoever does that a whole lot of trouble, I know that you’re going to be fired at. They’re gonna really say everything; that you’re an anti-semite, that you’re a monster, that you’re Nazi, etc, etc, etc, etc. But if do not squarely address the Jewish Zionist problem, you cannot understand modern history, and you cannot understand modern politics.
So if you are missing such a key element like that, it’s like trying to buy a car with no engine. It might look like a car, it might be very shiny, it might have very pretty lights, but it’s not going to take you anywhere.
Whether you agree or disagree with this analysis, the fact remains that Salbuchi’s assessment of the fundamental issue just also happens one of the most taboo subjects in not only the US, but throughout all of Western Society.
If one were to perform even a cursory examination of the two presidential candidates, one could come to the conclusion that Romney and Obama appear to represent two factions within the ruling establishments in America: Wall Street and Hollywood. Wall Street and Hollywood are, without question, the two epicenters of Jewish power in America.
The top operators of Wall Street and Hollywood appear to be engaged in a power struggle of sorts over who they want to “act” as President of the United States.
In the 2008 Presidential Elections, Wall Street appeared to have backed both then Senator Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, however, Wall Street now appears to have ditched President Obama in favor of Mitt Romney. Why is that?
The Wall Street crowd behind Mitt Romney also includes longtime business associate and friend, Benjamin Netanyahu and the warmongering, Jewish supremacist Likud Party of Israel .
The Hollywood crowd, which includes industry bigwigs, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender establishment (LGBT), various civil rights and minority groups, influential, iconic celebrities such Madonna, Jewish comedienne Sara Silverman and Oprah Winfrey, along with a host of other celebrities and the ever-important Holocaust® Orthodoxy establishment are firmly entrenched in the camp of President Obama.
It should go without saying that Wall Street and the American political establishment have extremely close ties, and even a revolving door relationship of sorts. It is however, worth noting that Hollywood has also had a close relationship with the American political establishment as well; going back to the governorship of California and presidency of Ronald Reagan, and even as far back as The Holocaust®.
Another overlapping interest between the opposing parties/factions that both Wall Street and Hollywood share, along with the Republican and Democrat parties is the unquestioning, unwavering support for the Jewish state of Israel. On the issue of support for Israel (ie; billions of dollars of free money provided by taxpayers), both Obama and Romney are in complete agreement. This fact is displayed in the diagram below. Feel free to click on the image for an interactive map to explore even more connections and overlapping relationships.
Haim Saban and Sheldon Adelson, with Adelson being the more mentioned of the two by the mainstream media, are but two Jewish billionaires that are active in within the American political establishment. Even more Jewish billionaire connections to the American political establishment can be found at the article “Jewish Money Tabs Romney & Obama.”
“In American politics we have several parties included under the blanket words “Democratic” and “Republican.” In oversimplified terms, as I have said, were the party of the middle class, and the Democrats were the party of the fringes. Both of these were subdivided, each with a Congressional and a National Party wing.
The Republican Congressional Party (representing localism) was much further to the right than the National Republican Party, and as such was closer to the petty-bourgeois than to the upper-middle class outlook. The Democratic Congressional party was much more clearly of the fringes and minorities (and thus often further to the Left) than the Democrat National Party.
The party machinery in each case was in Congressional party control during the intervals between the quadrennial presidential elections, but, in order to win these elections, each had to call into existence, in presidential election years, its shadowy National Party. This meant that the Republicans had to appear to move to the Left, closer to the Center, usually moving to the Right.
As a result, the National parties and their presidential candidates, with the Eastern Establishment assiduously fostering the process being the scenes, moved closer together and nearly met in the center with almost identical candidates and platforms, although the process was concealed, as much as possible, by the revival of obsolescent or meaningless war cries and slogans (often going back to the Civil War).
As soon as the presidential election was over, the two National parties vanished, and party controls fell back into the hands of the two Congressional parties, leaving the President in a precarious position between the two Congressional parties, neither of which was very close to the brief National coalition that had elected him.
The chief problem of American political life for a long time had been to make the two Congressional parties more national and international.
The argument of two parties should represent opposed ideas and policies, one perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinate and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. The policies that are vital and necessary for America are no longer subjects of significant disagreement, but are disputable only in details of procedure, priority, or method.”
Carroll Quigely – “Tragedy and Hope” pp. 1247-1248
Quigley was born in Boston, and attended Harvard University, where he studied history and earned B.A, M.A., and Ph.D. degrees. He taught at Princeton University, and then at Harvard, and then at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University from 1941 to 1976.
From 1941 until 1969, he taught a two-semester course at Georgetown on the development of civilizations. According to the obituary in the Washington Star, many alumni of Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service asserted that this was “the most influential course in their undergraduate careers”
In addition to his academic work, Quigley served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Navy, the Smithsonian Institution, and the House Select Committee on Astronautics and Space Exploration in the 1950s.
In his freshman year in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown, future U.S. President Bill Clinton took Quigley’s course, receiving a ‘B’ as his final grade in both semesters. Clinton named Quigley as an important influence on his aspirations and political philosophy in 1991, when launching his presidential campaign in a speech at Georgetown.
Click here to read “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time”