Under The Radar Media

DHS $9.7 Million Dollar Payout to ‘Safeguard the Jewish Community’

Warning: Under The Radar Media advocates no hate or violence toward The Department of Homeland Security’s preferred cultural and ethno-religious group, or any other federally protected cultural, ethno-religious groups

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has awarded 97% of the$10 million in security grants to Jewish non-governmental organizations (NGO) for 2012 in order to “safeguard the Jewish community!” DHS Secretary Janet Napalitano recently gave an interview to Jane Eisner of The Forward regarding the news of the award to the American Jewish community, and to discuss Homeland Security’s ongoing commitment to the Jewish State of Israel.

This extraordinary payout to a very small religious, cultural and ethnic group is quite astonishing considering the many hundreds, if not thousands of NGO’s that currently exist in the US, from non-profit organizations that benefit underprivileged Americans to educational non-profit organizations. Napalitano and other Jewish leaders maintain that Jews face special risks that non-Jews do not face.

For instance, Napalitano cites the “intensified rhetoric between Israel and Iran” as justification for this preferential treatment.  Napalitano also made the bizarre claim that Jews require special protection due to the 2009 Holocaust museum shooting, an attack that killed no Jews but rather left one Black security guard dead. Ironically, this paranoia has also caused some militant American Jews to take up arms and receive training from foreign troops on American soil, an activity that should be considered as subversive, if not outright terrorist activity by many law enforcement agencies.

One has to wonder, what kind of reaction this story would have received had it been reported in nightly news television broadcast media outlets such as FOX, CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC or NPR. The simple fact that this news wasn’t reported in mainstream televised or online news outlets should lead critical-thinking individuals to some pretty self-evident conclusions.

On a related side note, Under The Radar Media’s video production of “Homeland Security’s Janet Napalitano – Safeguarding the Jewish Community” has recently been uploaded to another YouTube channel and has been circulated fairly widely among many alternative news media websites. Unfortunately, the YouTube user that has the version that is getting the most traffic has the retitled the video “‘Jews Don’t have To Go Through TSA’: Homeland Security’s Janet Napalitano.”

This is rather unfortunate because the claim that “Jews don’t have to go through TSA” is totally inaccurate, at least at this point, and is not a claim that is made in the original video production. The video was already intentionally tongue-in-cheek and over the top, so the extra sensationalism of the false claim was totally unnecessary.

Nevertheless, it’s good that the video is making circulation. Despite the offending user’s inaccurate video title, we hope that the video itself will stand on its own and inspire some lively discussion.

Advertisements

Mainstream media calls for the ‘Israelification’ of US airports

Posted in 9/11, False Flag Terrorism, Israel, Jews, Maasanova, Political Correctness by maasanova on December 11, 2010

The calls for the US airports to adopt Israel’s racist, humiliating techniques and technology have been ongoing since Christmas 2009, when the Underwear Bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab allegedly tried to ignite an explosive device located in his pants.

Former UN official ‘not sure’ if 9/11 was created to justify war in the Middle East

Under The Radar Media

In an interview given to Arab Voices, a Pacifica radio program, anti-war activist Denis Halliday was on to discuss President Obama’s announcement on the U.S. withdrawal of some of its troops from occupied Iraq.  Halliday is a former UN Assistant Secretary General, and former UN Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq (1997-1998).  He resigned after a 34 year career with the UN to free himself of the constraints imposed on him and thereby speak out publicly on the terrible impact of UN economic sanctions on the people of Iraq.

At 49m55s into the interview, Halliday was posed with a question on whether American citizens, given the nation’s current Anti-Muslim hysteria and climate of fear, coupled with the desire to invade Iran should be concerned about the possibility of a false flag terror attack which could be used as another pretext for war.

Halliday anknowledged that Pearl Harbor was invented, as well as used as a pretext for the US to enter World War II, yet admitted that he was not so sure if he believed that 9/11 was the same type of event. Completely sidestepping the issue of a terror attack being used as a pretext to attack Iran, Halliday admitted he was well aware that people doubted the official story of 9/11, yet he could not wrap his mind around the concept that 9/11 could be anything other than Muslim retaliation against US military aggression.

Surprisingly, he seemed to blame 9/11 on Muslim anti-American sentiment over the military presence in Saudi Arabia. The host of Arab Voices, Said, countered that US foreign policy in the Middle East could not have been a justification for the 9/11 attacks as an act made in the name of Islam, since the killing of a human is forbidden according to the Quran.

It is almost unimaginable that someone with the breadth of knowledge of history and current events that Mr. Halliday holds could still be laboring under the delusion of 19 Muslim hijackers with the intent of committing Jihad as being the real culprits of the 9/11 staged media terror event. One must wonder if Mr. Halliday simply hasn’t bothered to review the extensive and exaustive 9/11 research that is easily available, or if he is aware of it but is worried about the stigma of being labeled a “conspiracy theorist,” or worse.

Mr. Halliday’s willingness  to promote the government storyline is consistent with the other left leaning individuals and media outlet’s efforts to stifle  any unapproved debate on 9/11 and US foreign policy.  Liberal funny man John Stewart  of the Daily Show recently took a swipe at anyone doubting the 9/11 Commission’s findings as he promoted his ‘Rally to Restore Sanity’.

Dr. Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff from the non-profit national media watchdog group Project Censored have recently been blackballed by the left-leaning Minuteman Media and Washington think tank  The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) for suggesting “that the events of September 11th have all the trappings of a potential state crime against democracy.”  Project Censored have long been well receieved by the liberal establishment, and has put its reputation on the line for daring to challenge the 9/11 Commission’s findings, and for promoting the controlled demolition theory of World Trade Centers 1, 2 and 7.

David Ray Griffin’s excellent article Left-Leaning Despisers of the 9/11 Truth Movement documents the phenomenon of left-leaning anti-war activists such as Mr. Halliday opposing the war, yet neglecting the very obvious reasons and machinations that got the US into these Middle East quagmires:

The Fear of Being Discredited

You are certainly right to fear that the left would be discredited by being aligned with a conspiracy theory that is scientifically unsupportable and even absurd. It is hard to imagine, however, what could discredit the left more than having many of its recognized leaders endorsing the Bush-Cheney administration’s 9/11 conspiracy theory, especially at a time when more and more scientists and people in relevant professions are pointing out its absurdities.

The Fear of Being Distracted

The second fear – that the focus on a false conspiracy theory has been distracting many people from more important matters – is equally valid. But this fear has been directed toward the wrong conspiracy theory. Nothing has distracted the United States and its allies from issues such as global apartheid, the ecological crisis, nuclear proliferation, and corporate power more than the “war on terror” – with its huge operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, its incessant terror alerts and stories of attacks prevented, and its depletion of our national treasuries. Lying at the root of this so-called war on terror, both historically and as present justification, is the official account of 9/11. So it is, as I wrote in response to Cockburn in Le Monde Diplomatique three years go, “The Truly Distracting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory.”

I recently completed a 15-city tour, presenting a lecture entitled “Is the War in Afghanistan Justified by 9/11?” My hope was that, by providing clear evidence that it is not – because the official account of 9/11 is false from beginning to end – “the 9/11 Truth Movement and more traditional Peace and Anti-War groups [would] be able to combine forces to oppose this illegal and immoral war.” I have written the present essay with the same hope.

President Barack Obama’s recent bizarre statement about “absorbing a terror attack”, along with Senator Lindsey Graham’s outrageous assertions that “there’s going to be an attack,” and “we have to get hit again,” have spurred  a false debate on the political left and the right as the mainstream media/banking/military complex appears to be conditioning the public for a host of horrible events.

The French Connection – September 16, 2010

Download mp3

Daryl Bradford Smith from I Am The Witness discusses the global economy and the issues of the day with geo-political analyst Adrian Salbuchi.

The entire Arab Muslim world was framed for the terror attacks of September 11, 2001

Posted in 9/11, Cover Up, False Flag Terrorism, Israel, Uncategorized, Zionism by maasanova on August 28, 2010

Under the Radar Media

Who is behind all of this anti-Arab, and anti-Muslim hysteria and fear-mongering that we have seen over the past few months reguarding the controversy of the “Ground Zero mosque?”  The same propagandists who gave us the official September 11, 2001 cover story,  the anthrax attack coverup, the lies about Saddam’s imaginary weapons of mass distruction, and the current  “Bomb Iran” coalition,  that’s who!

Check out this video of American and Israeli Zionist Jews explaining the 9/11 terror attacks to the BBC on the day of the attacks. It’s a good thing that these “experts” had cleared their schedules and were on hand on September 11, 2001 to explain the terror attacks to America and the Western world before US intelligence and their counterparts had a chance to investigate the attacks. What in the world would we have ever done without them? Keep in mind these Zionist warmongers had already named the culprits of the attacks, implicated the practically all of the Arab and Muslim countries, called for America to go war against these countries, and told Americans that they will have to give up some of their freedoms for security; all before any intelligence officials had a chance to investigate the crimes.

A War Against the West – published on 9-11-2001 by Israeli Institute IASPS
by Robert J. Loewenberg, President, IASPS

Today’s sensational attacks on the U. S., certainly by Muslims who were likely Arabs, are being described as “terrorist” acts by “madmen” for example by Chris Patton, EU. Others seeking an academic perspective along the lines of Sam Huntington, see the attacks as a new bi-polar division between Muslims and Western states and culture. Our reading at the Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies (Jerusalem and Washington, D. C.) is these attacks are the beginning of a struggle against the West in which the source or cause is primarily the West itself, a group of societies divided internally by an array of factors.

Practically speaking, residents of New York and Washington, D. C. as well as other U.S. cities can now expect routine terrorist assaults ranging from individual terrorist assaults, suicide bombings, germ and chemical attacks in subways and buildings. The existence in the U.S. of legal and tax exempt Arab and Muslim groups, for example CAIR, can be expected to fund and participate in, and most of all to defend these attacks while holding up their opponents as racist.

The strategic, military effect of this struggle against the West, presently most visible in the Middle East and concerning Islam and Arabs, finds its “advanced case” in Israel.  Just as Israel has been the object of an Arab undertaking, supported in the West (and most of all in Israel itself and among Jews) to extinguish, cruelly and barbarically to be sure by Arabs and Muslims,  Israel’s national existence, the assault today on the U.S. was driven by this same wish or hope to exterminate a nation and its people, and for which the source of support and complicity, grotesquely, resides in the West among its rulers and elites. In other words, what makes this effort a signal one in addition to being genocidal, is that its cause (to be distinguished from its executors) is not Arabs or Muslims or per Huntington, Islam.

Today’s opening assault in a war to destroy Western states is marked by two Western strategies respecting Israel and the West -by Israel and the West.

These strategies are 1) to establish among states and peoples as their leading principle that national existence is an option, particularly one that should be exercised against national existence and the balance of power by means of “conflict resolution,” cessation of “violence,”  by peace processes, treaties, moral equivalence and a host of similar undertakings to which Israel (and Jews) and the larger West are committed, and, 2) a strategy with respect to war and alliance which rejects the solution of conflicts, as in Ireland, Israel, Kosovo, by the victory of one side, the defeat and surrender of the other. The mantra: “there is no military solution to the conflict,” is at once the rejection of this simple response -victory, defeat, surrender -and, so far as such events can be “caused” by words and ideas –the direct cause of today’s attacks and their certain continuation.

Again, Israel is the “advanced case.” In a series of wars beginning in 1948, Israel has won by trading its final battle for a cease fire, an armistice and dollars. This is to say, Israel traded victory, surrender of the other side(s) and, of course, peace, borders, “neighbors”  for what it has today-a peace process. This trade included what the U.S.  experienced today and can expect to continue, indeed until victory or defeat.

We in the West, today in New York and Washington, D. C., are paying our price for supporting Israel’s “advanced case” of the affliction of the West. Our “pro-Israel” support of the Jewish state’s attempt to accommodate the Arabs instead of defeating them and establishing rational peace was perhaps a Western attempt to “buy off” our own day of reckoning for failure to face up to the obligations of self-defense and national existence.

If there is a simple, strategic “explanation” of today’s attacks on the U.S. it is this: the U.S. and the West, along with Israel, have insisted, at least since September 1993, that the Palestinian Problem has “no military solution.” At the end of the day, and after all the pundits are talked out in matters of “violence” and “peace” and the rest, the attack on the Twin Towers, the Pentagon (and the other assaults to come in what is now a serious if newfangled war) -which resulted in the hideous and unspeakable deaths of thousands of innocent souls, American citizens who have been effectively betrayed -these deaths were triggered by the peace process in Israel (and other peace processes) and by the very people and institutions of the West that are today making the speeches about “madmen” and “terrorism.”  The proximate charge of murder is on the murderers. The wider charge is on the West itself.

Vatic notes: 

Its amazing how fast the head of IASPS (The Israeli Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies) got this out on the day of the attack on 9-11.  We did not even know at this point who had done the attack.  So how did they know?   Remember, Israeli’s inside the twin towers were warned to leave.  So, this added to those other facts, shows they not only knew but were intimately involved in the full scope of the treasonous murder of American civilians.   Hmmmm, and now with all the evidence that Mossad was in part a player in the 9-11 false flag along with our treasonous insiders, this document truly highlights the intent of that event and what they expected to gain from it. No wonder those Mossad agents were celebrating on top of that van as they filmed the entire event. Look at how IASPS interpreted what they had done and blamed on the muslims. Is it clever? yes, but arrogance carries its own price. Its obvious this was all prepared before anyone ever knew who had done 9-11 until that evening and not before.

One astute commentor notes:

A key word in the article is “today’s,” but left unsaid was the time of day. The author of that article, Robert Loewenberg, is a dual citizen of the U.S. and Israel. Israel, where his bio says he now lives, is in an earlier time zone. When the first plane hit the World Trade Center, it was 3:45 P.M. in Israel. Israel evacuated its embassies at 5:54 P.M. Israel time. At 9:00 P.M. Israeli time, an FBI spokesman told CNN that they were “working on the assumption” that the crashes were part of a terrorist attack. At 11:00 P.M. Israeli time, Osama bin Laden was named as a suspect, based on “new and specific information.” Earlier suggestions that Muslims or Arabs were involved in the attacks had been reported as “unconfirmed.” At 3:30 A.M. September 12 Israeli time, Bush addressed the nation but doesn’t identify the attackers. As he speaks, member of Congress tell CNN during “private briefings” that there’s “enough evidence” to convince them that Osama bin Laden was behind the attacks. At 6:30 A.M. September 12 Israeli time, Bush wrote in his journal “The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today….We THINK it’s Osama bin Laden.” (emphasis added) Loewenberg’s article was obviously well prepared; it had to have taken hours to write. Given the time line, those were hours he didn’t have. Prior knowledge? You bet.

Remember CNN’s “Dancing Palestinians” stock footage being played endlessly with no context of what we were actually seeing? CNN told you that these Palestinians were celebrating the attacks, but it is highly likely that this footage was a “psyop” that was prepared in advance of the attacks and meant to negatively portray all Arab Muslims.

Remember the words from Sivan Kurzberg one of the five “Dancing Israelis” arrested on 9/11?

‘We Are Not Your Problem’ 

According to the police report, one of the passengers told the officers they had been on the West Side Highway in Manhattan “during the incident” — referring to the World Trade Center attack. The driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers, “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.”

Listen to the three-part mp3 audio series of the evidence that points to Zionist Jews, not Arab Muslims  as the conspirators behind the 9/11 terror bombing.


Download Part 1 – The Ugly Truth August 20, 2010 mp3


Download Part 2 – The Ugly Truth August 28, 2010 mp3


Download Part 3 – September 5, 2010 mp3

%d bloggers like this: