Partisan political forums and the comment section of most news websites are notorious for their “no talk” rules. The following screenshot was from a brief exchange on the progressive news blog Raw Story, where one commenter dared to discuss the video Six Million Jews – 1915 to 1938. The result of the mere mention of this video resulted in an immediate permaban by Chromatophore, one of Raw Story’s gatekeeping cyber-nannies. I wonder why Chromatophore and other internet forum moderators are so afraid of open discussion regarding this video, which contains no offensive, false or illegal content matter.
And following Chromatophore was Raw Story’s amen crowd:
TheSailor> Chromatophore •
Sometimes I wonder why the mods here make their decisions.
Not in this case.
3 △ ▽
Mickey Bitsko> Guest •
I don’t know who’s more pathetic, the weirdo who concocted that video or you for believing him.
1 △ ▽
Can comedy be used to inspire true political change? That is to say, can a simple comedian be dangerous to the status quo or political ruling class? The answer to this question is a resounding “yes!”
Controversial French comic Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala has been rattling the cages of the political establishment of France for the better part of a decade with various sketch comedy routines and monologues. His defiant, politically incorrect satire highlighting the African slave trade and the Jewish experience during WW2 has resonated with disaffected youths and minorities, while offending a certain coterie of France’s most powerful Jews. Dieudonné’s performances have prompted World Jewish Congress head Ronald Lauder to call on the French government to disrupt his ability to generate an income and shut his performances down for good.
While much has been already been written about the embattled comic, most Americans may be unaware as to exactly what was said that caused this hysterical response from the Jewish media establishment across the Western world. Readers looking to get a sampling of Dieudonné’s act should watch his one-man performance, “Mahmoud,” which is a nod to former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, currently available on YouTube with English subtitles.
In Mahmoud, Dieudonné admits his frustration with Hollywood’s constant portrayal of the “the crying Jew in pajamas, begging for a slice of bread.” He explains that he wants Hollywood to portray more of the Jews that we don’t see very often; “the Rambo Jew,” the Jewish terrorist that shoots up a ship full of peace activists, white collar criminals like “the Madoff Jew,” and child sexual predators like the “Polanski Jew,” along with Woody Allen and Jeffrey Epstein.
For addressing these disturbing facts and eliciting laughter from his audience all over France, Dieudonné has been branded a racist, a hate criminal by Jewish media and banned from performing throughout France. Download or have a listen to an interesting mp3 podcast on the Dieudonné controversy.
While there are a few comedians on the stand-up circuit who may dabble in politics and politically incorrect humor, the arena of political comedy in America is tame in comparison to the satire of Dieudonné. Take Jewish name-changer John Stewart (born Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz) for instance, who is currently America’s top political satirist. Stewart has had an extremely successful career lampooning mainstream media outlets and various politicians from both the left and right. His well developed shtick is pointing out the absurd in global politics, presenting current events in an amusing, yet seemingly truthful fashion, and often pretending to be a sort of opposition to the status quo.
His brother, Lawrence Leibowitz, is currently Chief Operating Officer of NYSE Euronext. If you need any more evidence that Stewart is a true insider, consider all the times that he’s used his program his platform to allow various politicians and policymakers to defend their decisions to destroy Iraq in 2003. Stewart’s uses the particularly simple yet effective tactic of taking extremely serious issues and presenting them jokes to his gullible liberal viewers. In the process, all Stewart has to do is to make a funny face and criminal malfeasance, treason and and war crimes are reduced to mere incompetence by the government and the crowd eats it up. Jon Stewart like his brother on Wall Street, is an operative and a sickening individual.
The rest of America’s political comedy comes from Saturday Night Live, the likes of radio shock jock Howard Stern and the fake independent, super liberal Bill Maher, who donated a $1 millions dollars to a superPAC supporting President Obama’s re-election. In truth, America’s entire upper echelon of the comedy industry is predominately Jewish, and has been for many years as noted in the 2013 documentary “When Comedy Went to School.”
Download or have a listen to this mp3 podcast to learn more about how comedians like Sarah Silverman, Adam Sandler, Jerry Seinfeld, and Larry David have given us our humor and help shape America’s cultural landscape.
Part of Dieudonné’s appeal with the youth of France appears to be a gesture he created called “the quenelle,” of which loosely translates in English as “up yours, about this far.” Dieudonné’s original intention of the gesture is said to be anti-establishment in its meaning, however that hasn’t stopped the people from using the quenelle in scenarios ranging from the hilarious, to situations which many Jews and philosemites consider to be vile and tasteless.
The most famous use of the quenelle was made in at the end of December 2013 by Nicolas Anelka, a black French soccer player who plays for West Brom, a premier league team in the UK. Anelka made the gesture in front of thousands of live spectators after scoring a goal, and he said that his gesture was a special dedication to his friend Dieudonne. This enraged the Jews, and Jewish sponsors have put pressure on West Brom and the Football Association (FA) to have Anelka severely punished for his transgression.
Around the same time that Anelka made the infamous gesture , French media published photos of France’s interior minister, Manuel Valls, posing with a group of students who were making the quenelle. As the hilarious photo made it into English news outlets, journalists were unable to convey the photo’s humor to its readers. The photo was spun into a “shame-shame” political correctness issue and bundled along side the attack on Anelka and Dieudonné. The fact that the smiling interior minister was unknowingly the butt of an inside joke likely fueled Valls intense efforts to ban Dieudonné’s routines the following month.
Across France, the political, economic and societal landscape threatens to rapidly unwind and bring with it the violence and turmoil that visited Paris in 2005, and then again in 2007. Tens of thousands of protests regularly take to the streets of Paris, voicing their displeasure on issues such as gay marriage, théorie du genre or gender theory, and their president François Hollande. One recent mass protest against Hollande included a faction of Dieudonné supporters and others shouting slogans such as “Juif casse-toi, la France n’est pas a toi” (“Jews you flaws, France is not yours”), “Juif! Juif! Juif! Juif!” (“Jews! Jews! Jews! Jews!”), “Juif, Licra: on n’en veut pas” (“Jews, Licra: We don’t want you”), “Juif, hors de France” (“Jews, out of France”) and “Faurisson a raison! Chambres á gaz c’est du bidon” (“Faurisson’s right! Gas chambers are bullshit”).
There is every indication that an uncontrolled resistance movement is growing in France and the Jewish establishment, along with their unpopular puppet Hollande, have got to be feeling powerless as to how to stop it from spreading across Europe and beyond. Although the quenelle is a seemingly insignificant part of this uprising, world Jewry knows that containing the quenelle is key to containing the popular uprising.
Back in the US, economic conditions and the many corrupt elected officials have made politically aware adults just as angry and disgusted as the French, but Americans are demoralized, off-balance and seem to be affected with a certain of hopelessness. Adults who are not politically aware are trapped inside of the broadcast media’s mind-warping womb of non-stop distractions; their soft minds nourished by hyper-sexual titillation, violence and mindless sports .
A recent study by McAfee revealed that 50% of Americans have used their smartphones to send sexually suggestive photos, and risqué e-mails and text messages. Reports and warnings of the NSA spying on all phone and internet communications is not likely to stop this casual obsession. Since upcoming generations have grown less susceptible to media lies and propaganda thanks to the Internet, it could be argued that hope in overturning the current system lies with the youth of America. The youth in general are however, mostly a national embarrassment. Many teenagers and young adults, especially females, seem to have developed an alarming pre-occupation with their rear ends, and they spend a considerable amount of time and energy “twerking,” posting “selfies” and pictures of their buttocks on social networks.
Aside from the cultural rot, Americans are also too divided along the racial and political divides. For example, conservative French and the nationalist types, who are normally ideological opposed to Muslims and African immigrants, seem to be smart enough to put their differences aside and find enough common ground to protest together on certain cultural issues. After the 2008 financial crisis, Americans on the left and the right couldn’t even come together to protest about the looting of the economy by the Jewish plutocrats of Goldman Sachs. There were two opportunities in fact, for Americans to come together over the issue of the economy. In 2009, conservative and libertarian types rose up to protest mostly corruption on Wall Street along the Affordable Care Act, another economic issue, but the left did not. Liberal media outlets like the Huffington Post and MSNBC were quick to label the Tea Party protesters as racists and bigots who just hated having a non-White president. Likewise, during the Occupy Wall Street protests of 2011, fake opposition news front, FOX News portrayed all protesters as dirty hippies, lazy hipsters and Che Guevara worshiping Communists and many conservatives appeared to avoid the demonstrations.
During the height of the Occupy protests, political commentator and radio broadcaster Mark Dankof, appeared on Iran’s Press TV along with Sara Flounders and Debra Sweet, two activists who claimed to speak for the entire Occupy Wall Street movement. Dankof argued that there was a certain dialog that was absent from the narrative being put forth by the protestors and the movement’s leaders. Dankof went on to highlight the thirty-plus Pro-Israel political action committees, along with the policies of the Federal Reserve and other Jewish banking institutions and their role in helping bring down the US to the state in which it exists.
The women denied that America’s economic woes had anything to do with the Israeli political wing of the organized Jewish community, and much like Dieudonné, the Occupy activists tried to dismiss Dankof as “racist, anti-Semitic, and divisive.” Mr. Dankof would never be invited on any mainstream radio station or television program in US to say what he said on Press TV. The irony is that he endured the same attacks for opposing Wall Street corruption by the very people claiming to be the opposition to Wall Street corruption is astounding and underscores an important point.
In a nutshell, the exchange on Press TV describes the rather simple dilemma that Americans face; the inability to name the true enemy without facing ridicule by their peers, and the inability to put minor ideological differences aside. A simple gesture has the ability to completely override the political divide and anti-free speech policies that cause self-censorship in our society. Viva la quenelle!
Response to Gordon Duff, Kevin Barrett, Mike Harris and Jeff Rense’s Lies on ‘40% False Information’
Gordon Duff, the arrogant, big-mouthed editor of the news website Veterans Today, recently made a surprising admission on an alternative talk show. So surprising was this admission, that it confirmed what many followers of alternative media had long suspected; that Duff was an “agent,” or propagator of disinformation.
Of course, the claim in question is Duff in his own words, admitting that he purposely writes 40% false information in his articles and editorials on Veterans Today. Interviewed on the October 12, 2012 broadcast of Mike Harris’ Short End of The Stick, which at the time was carried by Republic Broadcasting Network (archived here), Duff made the following statements:
I don’t know know any imaginable way you can get information…First of all…Because, about 30%, based on what I believe…and you know what? Who says I’m right? According to my belief, and I have as good of, uh access to information as anyone in the world, probably, anyone I know of. About 30% of what’s written on Veterans Today, is patently false. About 40% of what I write, is at least purposely, partially false, because if I didn’t write false information I wouldn’t be alive. I simply have to do that. I write…anything I write I write between the lines.
For your convenience, the time-stamp for the above claim is 70m35s, and the mp3 of the recording can be downloaded here. The admission also appears to corroborate a charge made by anti-Zionist Jeffrey Blankfort that Duff “is definitely some kind of liar, either accidental or intentional.”
On November 6, a short two minute edit of the broadcast was cobbled together along with a bit of annoying background noise at the intro and outro of the clip, and uploaded to the account of YouTube member rubixlucifer. The video was entitled “Gordon Duff of Veterans Today Admits To Writing 40% False Information.
After the video began to circulate widely through the alternative media, Duff appeared to no longer want to stand by his admission that a significant amount of his writing was, or is intentionally false.
Veterans Today then launched a fairly extensive, over-the-top damage control campaign over the following days in response to the video. Participating members involved in the attempt to censor, deny, obfuscate, explain away, the video include the aforementioned Mike Harris, Kevin Barrett of Truth Jihad Radio, alternative news giant Jeff Rense of Rense.com and the Rense Radio Network, and of course Duff himself.
As previously mentioned, many in the so-called alternative media have noted that Duff’s musings on various topics, whether on radio or in print, have long appeared to be questionable. Due to the cartoonish denial from Duff and his associates, Under The Radar Media deemed it appropriate to document a factual account of the controversy for the record.
Coverup Begins as YouTube Pulls the Offending Video
On November 9, 2012 (or possibly the day prior), Mike Harris, a Veterans Today staff writer and host of the Republic Broadcasting Network’s (RBN) Short End of the Stick, filed a copyright claim on the video “Gordon Duff of Veterans Today Admits To Writing 40% False Information,” and it was subsequently pulled from YouTube. As one Internet commenter noted, it’s the coverup that always brings them down, and the fact that the video was indeed pulled is a sure sign of guilt.
One slightly different version with of the original video with Duff’s claim featuring additional commentary can still be found on YouTube.
Under The Radar Media was previously unaware of Mike Harris and his radio program, and it appears that Harris stopped broadcasting his program on RBN shortly after October 12, 2012. According to several RBN subscribers, the October 12 broadcast of Short End of the Stick, as well as his other broadcasts are no longer available at the archives of RBN.
Although it appears that Harris has not written anything for Veterans Today since May 2012, he is still listed as one of its staff writers. Harris has appeared on the Rense Radio Show, in November 2012, where Rense informed his audiences that Harris would be hosting his show on the Rense Radio Network.
Whitewash Continues With Kevin Barrett Dutifully at the Helm
On same day that the video was pulled, Duff appeared at beginning of hour 2 of Kevin Barrett’s of Truth Jihad, which broadcasts on American Freedom Radio (archived here, mp3 here). Barrett states that he invited Duff to appear because his scheduled guest was a no-show. The topic of focus was to be the resignation of then CIA director David Petraeus, although a considerable amount of time was spent discussing the “controversy” surrounding the video. Both Barrett and Duff were jovial as they attempted to make light of the issue.
Duff alleges that audio portions of video had been cut from the original broadcast and that his words had been spliced together (time stamp 4m34s). Duff admitted that he had neither seen the video nor had he gone back to review the audio from the broadcast, but that Mike Harris told him that the audio was overdubbed and that “it wasn’t real.” Once again, feel free to refer to the time stamp 70m35s from the mp3 of the October 12, 2012 broadcast of Short End of the Stick to confirm that Duff’s claim is indeed, word for word as presented here.
The fact that Mike Harris had filed a copyright claim to have the video removed was not addressed.
Even more curious was Duff’s claim that the video”was initially received by” famed Holocaust® revisionist Dr. Fredrick Toben, formerly of the Adelaide Institute. Because of Toben’s trouble with various Jewish lobby groups over Holocaust® denial, Duff was presumably trying to and establish guilt by association in order to weaken the credibility of the video. Duff presented no evidence which suggests that Toben either received or distributed the video to other parties.
At one point, Barrett appeared to (rather gingerly) press Duff on whether he made the 40% claim or not, but eventually dropped the issue and went along with Duff’s story that the audio wasn’t real. Barrett warned his listeners not believe everything they read on the Internet, and later seemed to suggest that the Mossad was behind the video (time stamp 43m54s).
Jeff Rense Declares Bloggers Are Dangerous
On November 13, 2012, the damage control campaign resumed as Duff appeared on the Rense Radio show for two hours, with Jeff Rense playing the role of the strong closer. The video was immediately addressed at the beginning of hour 1 (mp3 here).
Once again, Duff admitted that he still had not reviewed the broadcast in question, and repeated the lie that the audio was a manipulation. Unlike Barrett’s lighthearted show, the Rense broadcast was tense, with Rense’s voice dripping with contempt and indignation that someone would dare use Duff’s own words in their proper context. However just like Barrett, Rense didn’t press Duff on what he said or didn’t say, but instead stood in staunch support of Duff’s continuing obfuscation of his claims about the video being false.
Again, the fact that Mike Harris filed a copyright claim to have the video removed was not addressed.
Duff also continued to display his bizarre fixation with Dr. Toben, and continued to suggest that Toben was involved in the creation and distribution of the video. Duff then told a strange, admittedly gossipy story about once having Toben as a dinner guest where Toben was alleged to have espoused a far-fetched theory on the AIDS virus. Duff made it clear that he neither liked nor trusted Toben. In fact, both Rense and Duff took the opportunity to take cryptic potshots at various Internet writers and alternative media personalities during the broadcast.
Rense then engaged in a textbook disinformation tactic and proceeded to build a straw man over Duff’s story on AIDS, and how the Internet is filled with misinformation or disinformation. The idea, it seemed was to distract from the issue, and to prop up Duff’s lie about the audio being chopped up and overdubbed.
At 3m06s into the broadcast Duff’s story of the 40% claim begins to change slightly. Duff’s new story was that if there was 40% false information to be found on Veterans Today, then it was the fault of his staff writers. He claimed that he gives his writers the freedom to post whatever they want, and that he simply does not have time to personally verify each and ever story from every writer. Rense quickly interjected and agreed that he too, gives his writers the same freedom and is unable to vet the claims from all of the writers whose articles appear on his website.
But the most outrageous, and perhaps most telling part of the program was at 10m22s into the broadcast, when Rense went on a tirade about his distaste for what he called “amateur bloggers,” how they harm innocent people and how dangerous the Internet really is with their malignant proliferation. This is most ironic since the writings of many amateur, but otherwise very talented bloggers have long appeared on Rense.com.
I’m fairly certain that there are at least a handful of Veterans Today staff writers who are indeed genuine individuals that are trying to put out good and honest information. At this point the genuine writers should be taking note of how Duff is so willing to casually throw them under the bus by blaming them for purposely putting out 40% false information on his site.
By putting the blame on his staff writers for his loose lips, Duff effectively absolved himself of any wrongdoing, and the listeners were left with the impression that the video was indeed a put up job. Rense and Duff then positioned themselves to be the ones with good intentions while also allowing themselves the luxury of plausible deniability should they ever again get caught in a similar situation. Very sneaky.
Gordon Duff claims that Veterans Today’s intended audience is not the alternative news community, but rather the international military and intelligence community. If this is true, then it begs the question, “why does Gordon Duff appear on so many alternative radio broadcasts such as Rense Radio if his target audience is not the alternative news community, and why does Veterans Today feature prominent longtime members of the alternative news community?”
Gordon Duff also claims to be an a trained intelligence officer who runs an corporation that does intelligence work for major governments. If true, then this admission by Duff is arguably more questionable than his claim of intentionally writing 40% false information on Veterans Today. All freedom seeking veterans should at the very least be wary of any associations with Veterans Today, if not avoid them outright.
Under The Radar Media
We are but days away from Election Day 2012. Now that all of the ridiculous election pageantry is over, Americans will finally get to choose whether to re-elect President Barack Obama, or vote him out and choose to elect Mitt Romney as President of the United States of America.
Tensions are running high among the populace. There seems to a growing unease as politics seems to be on the lips of eveyone, and people who are normally better versed in NFL and Dancing With The Stars are suddenly armchair political experts.
A growing number of Americans are aware that there are very serious problems with the American political establishment but are either unable, or unwilling to accept even the most basic, fundamental problem of the system. The interesting thing is that the problem is a very simple, easily identifiable one, however the solution has proven to be an extremely elusive one.
Speaking on internet radio back in September of 2010, independent Argentinian researcher, essayist and lecturer, Adrian Salbuchi made a short but poignant analysis on the fundamental problem of the American political system.
I think that we are reaching the point where are a series of acid tests, and one of those acid tests is that you cannot be discreet, nice, lukewarm, ahh…diplomat, about…for example, certain key questions. One of which is the Jewish question.
I know it’s going to bring whoever does that a whole lot of trouble, I know that you’re going to be fired at. They’re gonna really say everything; that you’re an anti-semite, that you’re a monster, that you’re Nazi, etc, etc, etc, etc. But if do not squarely address the Jewish Zionist problem, you cannot understand modern history, and you cannot understand modern politics.
So if you are missing such a key element like that, it’s like trying to buy a car with no engine. It might look like a car, it might be very shiny, it might have very pretty lights, but it’s not going to take you anywhere.
Whether you agree or disagree with this analysis, the fact remains that Salbuchi’s assessment of the fundamental issue just also happens one of the most taboo subjects in not only the US, but throughout all of Western Society.
If one were to perform even a cursory examination of the two presidential candidates, one could come to the conclusion that Romney and Obama appear to represent two factions within the ruling establishments in America: Wall Street and Hollywood. Wall Street and Hollywood are, without question, the two epicenters of Jewish power in America.
The top operators of Wall Street and Hollywood appear to be engaged in a power struggle of sorts over who they want to “act” as President of the United States.
In the 2008 Presidential Elections, Wall Street appeared to have backed both then Senator Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, however, Wall Street now appears to have ditched President Obama in favor of Mitt Romney. Why is that?
The Wall Street crowd behind Mitt Romney also includes longtime business associate and friend, Benjamin Netanyahu and the warmongering, Jewish supremacist Likud Party of Israel .
The Hollywood crowd, which includes industry bigwigs, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender establishment (LGBT), various civil rights and minority groups, influential, iconic celebrities such Madonna, Jewish comedienne Sara Silverman and Oprah Winfrey, along with a host of other celebrities and the ever-important Holocaust® Orthodoxy establishment are firmly entrenched in the camp of President Obama.
It should go without saying that Wall Street and the American political establishment have extremely close ties, and even a revolving door relationship of sorts. It is however, worth noting that Hollywood has also had a close relationship with the American political establishment as well; going back to the governorship of California and presidency of Ronald Reagan, and even as far back as The Holocaust®.
Another overlapping interest between the opposing parties/factions that both Wall Street and Hollywood share, along with the Republican and Democrat parties is the unquestioning, unwavering support for the Jewish state of Israel. On the issue of support for Israel (ie; billions of dollars of free money provided by taxpayers), both Obama and Romney are in complete agreement. This fact is displayed in the diagram below. Feel free to click on the image for an interactive map to explore even more connections and overlapping relationships.
Haim Saban and Sheldon Adelson, with Adelson being the more mentioned of the two by the mainstream media, are but two Jewish billionaires that are active in within the American political establishment. Even more Jewish billionaire connections to the American political establishment can be found at the article “Jewish Money Tabs Romney & Obama.”
Alex Jones–honest truth seeker or judas goat? Mike Piper debuts his new program asking the question all need to ask these days–’Who IS the enemy within?’
Michael Collins Piper has started a new podcast after leaving (being forced out of) the Republic Broadcasting Network (RBN). Piper suggests that Alex Jones may have had a hand in his dismissal from the network. He also calls Alex Jones a cult leader who is dragging down the alternative/freedom movement by perpetuating WWII and Nazi fairy tales.