Under The Radar Media

Wikileaks: Good For 9/11, Good For Israel

Also, a few other interesting tidbits:

Wanted by the CIA: Julian Assange – Wikileaks founder

“I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.”

Belfast Telegraph, July 19, 2010

(As if war and mass financial fraud had nothing to do with 9/11 )

***

Netanyahu: WikiLeaks revelations were good for Israel

“For years he has warned of the dangers the Iranian nuclear program poses to the entire region. These warnings had been vindicated, Netanyahu said.”

Ha’aretz Print Edition, November 30, 2010

***

WikiLeaks: Good for Israel

“Initial reactions from Israeli officials show that the WikiLeaks revelations were good for Israel and did not damage national security.

If anything, the leaks were positive and did not damage Israel’s image at all,” former National Security Adviser Giora Eiland told Voice of Israel government radio Sunday morning.”

Israel National News, November 29, 2010

***

Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel

“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq,” Ma’ariv quoted the former prime minister as saying. He reportedly added that these events “swung American public opinion in our favor.”

Ha’aretz, April 4, 2008

Gee imagine that !

Also,  good video making the rounds: Sex, Lies, Iran, Israel and WikiLeaks

Advertisements

Former UN official ‘not sure’ if 9/11 was created to justify war in the Middle East

Under The Radar Media

In an interview given to Arab Voices, a Pacifica radio program, anti-war activist Denis Halliday was on to discuss President Obama’s announcement on the U.S. withdrawal of some of its troops from occupied Iraq.  Halliday is a former UN Assistant Secretary General, and former UN Humanitarian Coordinator in Iraq (1997-1998).  He resigned after a 34 year career with the UN to free himself of the constraints imposed on him and thereby speak out publicly on the terrible impact of UN economic sanctions on the people of Iraq.

At 49m55s into the interview, Halliday was posed with a question on whether American citizens, given the nation’s current Anti-Muslim hysteria and climate of fear, coupled with the desire to invade Iran should be concerned about the possibility of a false flag terror attack which could be used as another pretext for war.

Halliday anknowledged that Pearl Harbor was invented, as well as used as a pretext for the US to enter World War II, yet admitted that he was not so sure if he believed that 9/11 was the same type of event. Completely sidestepping the issue of a terror attack being used as a pretext to attack Iran, Halliday admitted he was well aware that people doubted the official story of 9/11, yet he could not wrap his mind around the concept that 9/11 could be anything other than Muslim retaliation against US military aggression.

Surprisingly, he seemed to blame 9/11 on Muslim anti-American sentiment over the military presence in Saudi Arabia. The host of Arab Voices, Said, countered that US foreign policy in the Middle East could not have been a justification for the 9/11 attacks as an act made in the name of Islam, since the killing of a human is forbidden according to the Quran.

It is almost unimaginable that someone with the breadth of knowledge of history and current events that Mr. Halliday holds could still be laboring under the delusion of 19 Muslim hijackers with the intent of committing Jihad as being the real culprits of the 9/11 staged media terror event. One must wonder if Mr. Halliday simply hasn’t bothered to review the extensive and exaustive 9/11 research that is easily available, or if he is aware of it but is worried about the stigma of being labeled a “conspiracy theorist,” or worse.

Mr. Halliday’s willingness  to promote the government storyline is consistent with the other left leaning individuals and media outlet’s efforts to stifle  any unapproved debate on 9/11 and US foreign policy.  Liberal funny man John Stewart  of the Daily Show recently took a swipe at anyone doubting the 9/11 Commission’s findings as he promoted his ‘Rally to Restore Sanity’.

Dr. Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff from the non-profit national media watchdog group Project Censored have recently been blackballed by the left-leaning Minuteman Media and Washington think tank  The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) for suggesting “that the events of September 11th have all the trappings of a potential state crime against democracy.”  Project Censored have long been well receieved by the liberal establishment, and has put its reputation on the line for daring to challenge the 9/11 Commission’s findings, and for promoting the controlled demolition theory of World Trade Centers 1, 2 and 7.

David Ray Griffin’s excellent article Left-Leaning Despisers of the 9/11 Truth Movement documents the phenomenon of left-leaning anti-war activists such as Mr. Halliday opposing the war, yet neglecting the very obvious reasons and machinations that got the US into these Middle East quagmires:

The Fear of Being Discredited

You are certainly right to fear that the left would be discredited by being aligned with a conspiracy theory that is scientifically unsupportable and even absurd. It is hard to imagine, however, what could discredit the left more than having many of its recognized leaders endorsing the Bush-Cheney administration’s 9/11 conspiracy theory, especially at a time when more and more scientists and people in relevant professions are pointing out its absurdities.

The Fear of Being Distracted

The second fear – that the focus on a false conspiracy theory has been distracting many people from more important matters – is equally valid. But this fear has been directed toward the wrong conspiracy theory. Nothing has distracted the United States and its allies from issues such as global apartheid, the ecological crisis, nuclear proliferation, and corporate power more than the “war on terror” – with its huge operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, its incessant terror alerts and stories of attacks prevented, and its depletion of our national treasuries. Lying at the root of this so-called war on terror, both historically and as present justification, is the official account of 9/11. So it is, as I wrote in response to Cockburn in Le Monde Diplomatique three years go, “The Truly Distracting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory.”

I recently completed a 15-city tour, presenting a lecture entitled “Is the War in Afghanistan Justified by 9/11?” My hope was that, by providing clear evidence that it is not – because the official account of 9/11 is false from beginning to end – “the 9/11 Truth Movement and more traditional Peace and Anti-War groups [would] be able to combine forces to oppose this illegal and immoral war.” I have written the present essay with the same hope.

President Barack Obama’s recent bizarre statement about “absorbing a terror attack”, along with Senator Lindsey Graham’s outrageous assertions that “there’s going to be an attack,” and “we have to get hit again,” have spurred  a false debate on the political left and the right as the mainstream media/banking/military complex appears to be conditioning the public for a host of horrible events.

Stranger Than Fiction: An Independent Investigation of 9/11 and the War On Terrorism

Posted in 9/11, Cover Up, False Flag Terrorism, Iraq, Israel, Jews, Mainstream Media, Terrorism, Uncategorized, War, Zionism by maasanova on August 25, 2010

Obama: Same or worse on all major issues

Posted in Alternative Media, Barack Obama, Iraq, Left-Right Paradigm, War by maasanova on August 5, 2010

Image

Ryan Dawson
Anti-Neocons.com

Obama pledged to reduce the number of Combat Troops in Iraq. This got repeated by others simply as reducing troops in Iraq. The truth is Obama is not changing anything. He claimed to be reducing the number to between 35,000 and 50,000, which later became the high number 50,000. He is leaving 50,000 or more combat troops in Iraq. Tens of thousands of other troops occupying Iraq will be redefined as non-combat troops even though their present actions as combat troops won’t be changing. It’s simple, just rename the the title for the units and call them something else and then you can claim on paper that combat troop levels have decreased. This is a lot like renaming a POW, an enemy combatant, in order to skirt around the rule that forbids torture to POWs. Do they really think the American people are that stupid? Yes they do because they know the media isn’t going to explain it to you. They’re going to sell it to you.

“The troop withdrawal as planned would leave behind as many as 50,000 U.S. troops. That’s an awful lot. Even Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi thinks that may be too much. She told Rachel Maddow, “I don’t know what the justification is for 50,000, at the present…I would think a third of that, maybe 20,000, a little more than a third, 15,000 or 20,000.

Those troops won’t include officially designated “combat” troops. But those tens of thousands of troops will still be occupying Iraq. Doing what? Very likely, just what combat troops do — they would walk and talk and bomb and shoot like combat troops, but they’d be called something else.”

Another problem is that with just half a month left there are still 77,500 combat troops in Iraq even after changing the definition of the word. How they’re going to get 25,000 less is no mystery. They aren’t, and never intended on it. The troop levels haven’t changed the troop labels have changed. And there are even more people with guns killing people in Afghanistan. This also doesn’t include the large number of “contractors” a nice civilian sounding word given to hired mercenaries who kill more civilians than the military and whose own deaths are not counted in the statistics for the number of Americans killed.

Also:

Obama drops 2009 pledge to withdraw combat troops from Iraq

8 US killed in Afghanistan in the last 24 hours

Tagged with: , , ,

Former congresswoman Cynthia McKinney exposes the culture of corruption in Congress

Cynthia-Mckinney

download mp3

Former six term congresswoman Cynthia McKinney is interviewed by Ognir from The Info Underground on a variety of topics including, human rights in America and abroad, sex blackmail of US polictians, infiltration of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the early stages of her political career, balkanization of US political system for Israel, and more.

%d bloggers like this: