An Internet troll identifying himself as “Jewish Freedom” recently came across a YouTube video entitled Jewish Media Establishment Attacks Dieudonné. As you can see in the screenshot below, Jewish Freedom ruled that the video is “anti-semitic,” requested that the video be removed and presumably, placed the YouTube user name/url address on some kind of Jewish database for future reference. By his own admission (see comments from his Google+ page), this troll created a YouTube account to simply to flag user’s content for removal.
What Jewish Freedom failed to realize was that the video he objects to is nothing more than a Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC) mp3 podcast entitled “How controversial comic Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala sparked a tug-of-war over free speech and french values.” Perhaps Jewish Freedom objected to the imagery that was used in the video which depicted several members of his tribe, including the Jewish Democrat NY State Assembly District 48 Dov Hikind, in racially insensitive blackface. Or maybes he simply objected to the title of the video which states the fact that the mainstream media is primarily owned by Jews and Jewish interests.
Either way, trolls like Jewish Freedom have infested the Internet with their anti-free speech harassment and troublemaking for years, and their cyberstalking and efforts to censor free speech have grown more brazen. Some of these trolls, like the Jewish Internet Defense Force, form gangs that have openly engaged in, apparently, hacking into Facebook’s server to remove certain pages. Other Internet trolls are more subversive, and actually work for the Israeli government to spread lies and pro-Israel propaganda. The most serious of these self-declared policemen of the Internet are the holocaust educators, rabbis, and other advocates of Jewish interests (professional Jews and philosemites) who have formed various consulting groups and non-profit organizations that for years, have quitely, yet openly advocate for Internet censorship.
In the following document we will give an insight into the Jewish penetration of the Internet and also show the level of cooperation between leading Jewish Internet entrepreneurs and the racist Jewish Apartheid state of Israel.
This document will not cover the entire field. Also, as it is timebound to an an anlysis that is from a 2009 perspective – things will change. Companies will change names, new actors will appear. But still this piece of work is unique and will give a guide into the mechanisms behind the Net, mechanisms that will continue to act even in the future. And as many of these Jewish entrepreneurs are rather young and the Internet seems to be here to stay, we will hear from them for a long time onwards.
From Tablet Magazine – A New Read on Jewish life:
Dutch antiracism groups have filed criminal charges against a pro-Palestinian organization called Stop de Bezetting—“Stop the Occupation”—whose website published an article accusing Jews of controlling the Internet. JTA reports that the Center for Information and Documentation on Israel and the Dutch Complaints Bureau for Discrimination on the Internet have joined forces, filing a complaint against Stop de Bezetting that labels the text “offensive to Jews.” Stop de Bezetting’s founder, Gretta Duisenberg, denies breaking Dutch laws that forbid disseminating material with intention of inciting hate or discrimination.
The article in question [The Jewish Hand Behind The Internet], was written in 2009 by the California-based Freedom Research Foundation and mentions the names of Jews involved with Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, MySpace, and eBay. Titled “The Jewish Hand Behind the Internet,” the article is split into subsections that include “The Jewish Entourage at Google,” “Zuckerberg’s Jewish Entourage at Facebook,” “Google’s Cooperating with Jewish Censors,” and “More Tricks to Control Information on Wikipedia.” Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales is called the “darling of the Jewish crowd at Harvard” and Sheryl Sandberg, who worked at Google before becoming the Chief Operating Officer of Facebook, is mocked for being involved with philanthropy, a “favorite Jewish pastime.” The article also chronicles in great length the trips Internet moguls have taken to Israel.
Warning: Under The Radar Media advocates no hate or violence toward The Department of Homeland Security’s preferred cultural and ethno-religious group, or any other federally protected cultural, ethno-religious groups
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has awarded 97% of the$10 million in security grants to Jewish non-governmental organizations (NGO) for 2012 in order to “safeguard the Jewish community!” DHS Secretary Janet Napalitano recently gave an interview to Jane Eisner of The Forward regarding the news of the award to the American Jewish community, and to discuss Homeland Security’s ongoing commitment to the Jewish State of Israel.
This extraordinary payout to a very small religious, cultural and ethnic group is quite astonishing considering the many hundreds, if not thousands of NGO’s that currently exist in the US, from non-profit organizations that benefit underprivileged Americans to educational non-profit organizations. Napalitano and other Jewish leaders maintain that Jews face special risks that non-Jews do not face.
For instance, Napalitano cites the “intensified rhetoric between Israel and Iran” as justification for this preferential treatment. Napalitano also made the bizarre claim that Jews require special protection due to the 2009 Holocaust museum shooting, an attack that killed no Jews but rather left one Black security guard dead. Ironically, this paranoia has also caused some militant American Jews to take up arms and receive training from foreign troops on American soil, an activity that should be considered as subversive, if not outright terrorist activity by many law enforcement agencies.
One has to wonder, what kind of reaction this story would have received had it been reported in nightly news television broadcast media outlets such as FOX, CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC or NPR. The simple fact that this news wasn’t reported in mainstream televised or online news outlets should lead critical-thinking individuals to some pretty self-evident conclusions.
On a related side note, Under The Radar Media’s video production of “Homeland Security’s Janet Napalitano – Safeguarding the Jewish Community” has recently been uploaded to another YouTube channel and has been circulated fairly widely among many alternative news media websites. Unfortunately, the YouTube user that has the version that is getting the most traffic has the retitled the video “‘Jews Don’t have To Go Through TSA’: Homeland Security’s Janet Napalitano.”
This is rather unfortunate because the claim that “Jews don’t have to go through TSA” is totally inaccurate, at least at this point, and is not a claim that is made in the original video production. The video was already intentionally tongue-in-cheek and over the top, so the extra sensationalism of the false claim was totally unnecessary.
Nevertheless, it’s good that the video is making circulation. Despite the offending user’s inaccurate video title, we hope that the video itself will stand on its own and inspire some lively discussion.
The YouTube slideshow of Helen Thomas interview on WMRN 1490 AM. Interview date December 7, 2010.
Under the Radar Media
Who is behind all of this anti-Arab, and anti-Muslim hysteria and fear-mongering that we have seen over the past few months reguarding the controversy of the “Ground Zero mosque?” The same propagandists who gave us the official September 11, 2001 cover story, the anthrax attack coverup, the lies about Saddam’s imaginary weapons of mass distruction, and the current “Bomb Iran” coalition, that’s who!
Check out this video of American and Israeli Zionist Jews explaining the 9/11 terror attacks to the BBC on the day of the attacks. It’s a good thing that these “experts” had cleared their schedules and were on hand on September 11, 2001 to explain the terror attacks to America and the Western world before US intelligence and their counterparts had a chance to investigate the attacks. What in the world would we have ever done without them? Keep in mind these Zionist warmongers had already named the culprits of the attacks, implicated the practically all of the Arab and Muslim countries, called for America to go war against these countries, and told Americans that they will have to give up some of their freedoms for security; all before any intelligence officials had a chance to investigate the crimes.
A War Against the West – published on 9-11-2001 by Israeli Institute IASPS
by Robert J. Loewenberg, President, IASPS
Today’s sensational attacks on the U. S., certainly by Muslims who were likely Arabs, are being described as “terrorist” acts by “madmen” for example by Chris Patton, EU. Others seeking an academic perspective along the lines of Sam Huntington, see the attacks as a new bi-polar division between Muslims and Western states and culture. Our reading at the Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies (Jerusalem and Washington, D. C.) is these attacks are the beginning of a struggle against the West in which the source or cause is primarily the West itself, a group of societies divided internally by an array of factors.
Practically speaking, residents of New York and Washington, D. C. as well as other U.S. cities can now expect routine terrorist assaults ranging from individual terrorist assaults, suicide bombings, germ and chemical attacks in subways and buildings. The existence in the U.S. of legal and tax exempt Arab and Muslim groups, for example CAIR, can be expected to fund and participate in, and most of all to defend these attacks while holding up their opponents as racist.
The strategic, military effect of this struggle against the West, presently most visible in the Middle East and concerning Islam and Arabs, finds its “advanced case” in Israel. Just as Israel has been the object of an Arab undertaking, supported in the West (and most of all in Israel itself and among Jews) to extinguish, cruelly and barbarically to be sure by Arabs and Muslims, Israel’s national existence, the assault today on the U.S. was driven by this same wish or hope to exterminate a nation and its people, and for which the source of support and complicity, grotesquely, resides in the West among its rulers and elites. In other words, what makes this effort a signal one in addition to being genocidal, is that its cause (to be distinguished from its executors) is not Arabs or Muslims or per Huntington, Islam.
Today’s opening assault in a war to destroy Western states is marked by two Western strategies respecting Israel and the West -by Israel and the West.
These strategies are 1) to establish among states and peoples as their leading principle that national existence is an option, particularly one that should be exercised against national existence and the balance of power by means of “conflict resolution,” cessation of “violence,” by peace processes, treaties, moral equivalence and a host of similar undertakings to which Israel (and Jews) and the larger West are committed, and, 2) a strategy with respect to war and alliance which rejects the solution of conflicts, as in Ireland, Israel, Kosovo, by the victory of one side, the defeat and surrender of the other. The mantra: “there is no military solution to the conflict,” is at once the rejection of this simple response -victory, defeat, surrender -and, so far as such events can be “caused” by words and ideas –the direct cause of today’s attacks and their certain continuation.
Again, Israel is the “advanced case.” In a series of wars beginning in 1948, Israel has won by trading its final battle for a cease fire, an armistice and dollars. This is to say, Israel traded victory, surrender of the other side(s) and, of course, peace, borders, “neighbors” for what it has today-a peace process. This trade included what the U.S. experienced today and can expect to continue, indeed until victory or defeat.
We in the West, today in New York and Washington, D. C., are paying our price for supporting Israel’s “advanced case” of the affliction of the West. Our “pro-Israel” support of the Jewish state’s attempt to accommodate the Arabs instead of defeating them and establishing rational peace was perhaps a Western attempt to “buy off” our own day of reckoning for failure to face up to the obligations of self-defense and national existence.
If there is a simple, strategic “explanation” of today’s attacks on the U.S. it is this: the U.S. and the West, along with Israel, have insisted, at least since September 1993, that the Palestinian Problem has “no military solution.” At the end of the day, and after all the pundits are talked out in matters of “violence” and “peace” and the rest, the attack on the Twin Towers, the Pentagon (and the other assaults to come in what is now a serious if newfangled war) -which resulted in the hideous and unspeakable deaths of thousands of innocent souls, American citizens who have been effectively betrayed -these deaths were triggered by the peace process in Israel (and other peace processes) and by the very people and institutions of the West that are today making the speeches about “madmen” and “terrorism.” The proximate charge of murder is on the murderers. The wider charge is on the West itself.
Its amazing how fast the head of IASPS (The Israeli Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies) got this out on the day of the attack on 9-11. We did not even know at this point who had done the attack. So how did they know? Remember, Israeli’s inside the twin towers were warned to leave. So, this added to those other facts, shows they not only knew but were intimately involved in the full scope of the treasonous murder of American civilians. Hmmmm, and now with all the evidence that Mossad was in part a player in the 9-11 false flag along with our treasonous insiders, this document truly highlights the intent of that event and what they expected to gain from it. No wonder those Mossad agents were celebrating on top of that van as they filmed the entire event. Look at how IASPS interpreted what they had done and blamed on the muslims. Is it clever? yes, but arrogance carries its own price. Its obvious this was all prepared before anyone ever knew who had done 9-11 until that evening and not before.
One astute commentor notes:
A key word in the article is “today’s,” but left unsaid was the time of day. The author of that article, Robert Loewenberg, is a dual citizen of the U.S. and Israel. Israel, where his bio says he now lives, is in an earlier time zone. When the first plane hit the World Trade Center, it was 3:45 P.M. in Israel. Israel evacuated its embassies at 5:54 P.M. Israel time. At 9:00 P.M. Israeli time, an FBI spokesman told CNN that they were “working on the assumption” that the crashes were part of a terrorist attack. At 11:00 P.M. Israeli time, Osama bin Laden was named as a suspect, based on “new and specific information.” Earlier suggestions that Muslims or Arabs were involved in the attacks had been reported as “unconfirmed.” At 3:30 A.M. September 12 Israeli time, Bush addressed the nation but doesn’t identify the attackers. As he speaks, member of Congress tell CNN during “private briefings” that there’s “enough evidence” to convince them that Osama bin Laden was behind the attacks. At 6:30 A.M. September 12 Israeli time, Bush wrote in his journal “The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today….We THINK it’s Osama bin Laden.” (emphasis added) Loewenberg’s article was obviously well prepared; it had to have taken hours to write. Given the time line, those were hours he didn’t have. Prior knowledge? You bet.
Remember CNN’s “Dancing Palestinians” stock footage being played endlessly with no context of what we were actually seeing? CNN told you that these Palestinians were celebrating the attacks, but it is highly likely that this footage was a “psyop” that was prepared in advance of the attacks and meant to negatively portray all Arab Muslims.
Remember the words from Sivan Kurzberg one of the five “Dancing Israelis” arrested on 9/11?
‘We Are Not Your Problem’
According to the police report, one of the passengers told the officers they had been on the West Side Highway in Manhattan “during the incident” — referring to the World Trade Center attack. The driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers, “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.”
Listen to the three-part mp3 audio series of the evidence that points to Zionist Jews, not Arab Muslims as the conspirators behind the 9/11 terror bombing.