Under The Radar Media
We are but days away from Election Day 2012. Now that all of the ridiculous election pageantry is over, Americans will finally get to choose whether to re-elect President Barack Obama, or vote him out and choose to elect Mitt Romney as President of the United States of America.
Tensions are running high among the populace. There seems to a growing unease as politics seems to be on the lips of eveyone, and people who are normally better versed in NFL and Dancing With The Stars are suddenly armchair political experts.
A growing number of Americans are aware that there are very serious problems with the American political establishment but are either unable, or unwilling to accept even the most basic, fundamental problem of the system. The interesting thing is that the problem is a very simple, easily identifiable one, however the solution has proven to be an extremely elusive one.
Speaking on internet radio back in September of 2010, independent Argentinian researcher, essayist and lecturer, Adrian Salbuchi made a short but poignant analysis on the fundamental problem of the American political system.
I think that we are reaching the point where are a series of acid tests, and one of those acid tests is that you cannot be discreet, nice, lukewarm, ahh…diplomat, about…for example, certain key questions. One of which is the Jewish question.
I know it’s going to bring whoever does that a whole lot of trouble, I know that you’re going to be fired at. They’re gonna really say everything; that you’re an anti-semite, that you’re a monster, that you’re Nazi, etc, etc, etc, etc. But if do not squarely address the Jewish Zionist problem, you cannot understand modern history, and you cannot understand modern politics.
So if you are missing such a key element like that, it’s like trying to buy a car with no engine. It might look like a car, it might be very shiny, it might have very pretty lights, but it’s not going to take you anywhere.
Whether you agree or disagree with this analysis, the fact remains that Salbuchi’s assessment of the fundamental issue just also happens one of the most taboo subjects in not only the US, but throughout all of Western Society.
If one were to perform even a cursory examination of the two presidential candidates, one could come to the conclusion that Romney and Obama appear to represent two factions within the ruling establishments in America: Wall Street and Hollywood. Wall Street and Hollywood are, without question, the two epicenters of Jewish power in America.
The top operators of Wall Street and Hollywood appear to be engaged in a power struggle of sorts over who they want to “act” as President of the United States.
In the 2008 Presidential Elections, Wall Street appeared to have backed both then Senator Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, however, Wall Street now appears to have ditched President Obama in favor of Mitt Romney. Why is that?
The Wall Street crowd behind Mitt Romney also includes longtime business associate and friend, Benjamin Netanyahu and the warmongering, Jewish supremacist Likud Party of Israel .
The Hollywood crowd, which includes industry bigwigs, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender establishment (LGBT), various civil rights and minority groups, influential, iconic celebrities such Madonna, Jewish comedienne Sara Silverman and Oprah Winfrey, along with a host of other celebrities and the ever-important Holocaust® Orthodoxy establishment are firmly entrenched in the camp of President Obama.
It should go without saying that Wall Street and the American political establishment have extremely close ties, and even a revolving door relationship of sorts. It is however, worth noting that Hollywood has also had a close relationship with the American political establishment as well; going back to the governorship of California and presidency of Ronald Reagan, and even as far back as The Holocaust®.
Another overlapping interest between the opposing parties/factions that both Wall Street and Hollywood share, along with the Republican and Democrat parties is the unquestioning, unwavering support for the Jewish state of Israel. On the issue of support for Israel (ie; billions of dollars of free money provided by taxpayers), both Obama and Romney are in complete agreement. This fact is displayed in the diagram below. Feel free to click on the image for an interactive map to explore even more connections and overlapping relationships.
Haim Saban and Sheldon Adelson, with Adelson being the more mentioned of the two by the mainstream media, are but two Jewish billionaires that are active in within the American political establishment. Even more Jewish billionaire connections to the American political establishment can be found at the article “Jewish Money Tabs Romney & Obama.”
While at International Media Partners (IMP) we also created CEO Institutes, which ran events on global themes for the chief executives of big companies. Some of these business leaders were chillingly deal oriented, as I saw at a dinner one night when I was seated between the CEO of a leading aircraft manufacturer and Representative Pat Schroeder, then the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee. The CEO leaned across me to speak to Representative Schroeder.
“Here’s the deal,” he said. “I want to sell a plane to Muammar Qaddafi and he wants to buy one. But we have sanctions in place that won’t let me sell to him. The U.S. wants this guy dead. So what I’m thinking is, if you help me get the okay to sell him the plane, I’ll build it with explosive bolts connecting the wings to the fuselage. Then, one day he’s up flying over the Med and we push a button. He’s gone. I make my sale. Everyone’s happy.
Globalist insider David Rothkopf alleges the possibility of a quasi-extrajudicial killing of Muammar Qaddafi, the fallen leader of soon-to-be-occupied Libya, which by my guess is a conversation would have had to have taken place in the early to mid 1970’s. Any takers on which company it was whose CEO actually proposed this vile, criminal conspiracy? It seems that the plan has always been that the United States would assassinate Qaddafi someday, and for what?
Those who aren’t afraid of a little research are coming to the conclusion that he is not quite the “evil-doer” that the mainstream media has portrayed him to be over the years. While it may be hard for one to argue that any world leader is a necessarily a “good guy,” I’d be willing to put Qaddafi’s accomplishments next to that of Mr. Obama, George W. Bush or any other stooge that has acted as president of the United States any day.
Besides, if the Zionist mass media is trying to convince us to hate the latest “evil-doer,” one should, by default be immediately skeptical as to why. Especially when they are trying to sell us on a shiny brand new war. Kinda makes you wonder about those who continue to carry the water for the UN/NATO corporate takeover of Libya, right?
Thanks to Jackie Jura of Orwell Today for her meticulous research on the modern history of Muammar Qaddafi and Libya
Another year has passed since the September 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S. Gradually the initial mainstream media version of what happened on that gruesome day is proving to be false. Increasingly, credible and respected scientists, architects, ex-governmental officials, religious leaders, journalists, military officers and others are publicly coming out with information that refutes mainstream media’s version of events. What is more interesting is that besides being called “kooks” and the information presented being called “conspiracy theories”, the actual substance of the new information debunking mainstream media reports is going unchallenged! The new information about 9/11 and the ones presenting it are being called all kinds of names, however the information being presented is not being challenged or proven in any way to be false.
Furthermore, after all these years the FBI has not uncovered any Al Qaeda cells in the United States nor has it found any paper trail or hard evidence connecting Osama Bin Laden to 9/11. Although thousands of Muslims have been arrested, not one has been convicted of acts of terrorism. There have been many arrests of Muslims for alleged “intentions” to commit terrorism and there are also many cases where FBI agent provocateurs were used to plant evidence and lead terror campaigns setting up Muslims to be charged for acts of terrorism. This has caused legal actions to be brought against the FBI. It also begs the question that if indeed Muslims were so proned to commit terrorism, why did the FBI have to conduct subversive operations designed to lead and entrap Muslims in acts of terror?
The U.S. Marine Corps has banned Twitter, Facebook, MySpace and other social media sites from its networks, effective immediately.
“These internet sites in general are a proven haven for malicious actors and content and are particularly high risk due to information exposure, user generated content and targeting by adversaries,” reads a Marine Corps order, issued Monday. “The very nature of SNS [social network sites] creates a larger attack and exploitation window, exposes unnecessary information to adversaries and provides an easy conduit for information leakage that puts OPSEC [operational security], COMSEC [communications security], [and] personnel… at an elevated risk of compromise.”
The Marines’ ban will last a year. It was drawn up in response to a late July warning from U.S. Strategic Command, which told the rest of the military it was considering a Defense Department-wide ban on the Web 2.0 sites, due to network security concerns. Scams, worms, and Trojans often spread unchecked throughout social media sites, passed along from one online friend to the next. “The mechanisms for social networking were never designed for security and filtering. They make it way too easy for people with bad intentions to push malicious code to unsuspecting users,” a Stratcom source told Danger Room.
Yet many within the Pentagon’s highest ranks find value in the Web 2.0 tools. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has 4,000 followers on Twitter. The Department of Defense is getting ready to unveil a new home page, packed with social media tools. The Army recently ordered all U.S. bases to provide access to Facebook. Top generals now blog from the battlefield.
“OPSEC is paramount. We will have procedures in place to deal with that,” Price Floyd, the Pentagon’s newly-appointed social media czar, told Danger Room. “What we can’t do is let security concerns trump doing business. We have to do business… We need to be everywhere men and women in uniform are and the public is. If that’s MySpace and YouTube, that’s where we need to be, too.”
The Marines say they will issue waivers to the Web 2.0 blockade, if a “mission critical need” can be proven. And they will continue to allow access to the military’s internal “SNS-like services.” But for most members of the Corps, access to the real, public social networks is now shut off for the next year.